Technical White Paper v2.0

EnerBase Protocol
Technical Specification

A comprehensive technical overview of the EnerBase tokenization protocol, blockchain architecture, compliance framework, and institutional infrastructure for energy asset digitization on Stellar.

Abstract

EnerBase is an institutional-grade tokenization protocol built on the Stellar blockchain that enables compliant, liquid exposure to global energy sector assets. By leveraging Stellar's native asset framework, Federated Byzantine Agreement consensus, and regulatory compliance primitives (SEP-0008, SEP-0035), EnerBase provides institutional investors with programmable, 24/7 tradeable representations of energy companies across oil & gas, renewables, utilities, and infrastructure.

This white paper details the technical architecture, tokenomics, regulatory compliance mechanisms, custody frameworks, and risk management protocols that underpin the EnerBase ecosystem. The protocol currently supports 260 energy assets across 7 global regions, with real-time settlement, fractional ownership, and institutional-grade security controls.

Table of Contents

1Introduction & Market Context
p.3
2Stellar Blockchain Architecture
p.7
3Token Issuance & Asset Framework
p.15
4Regulatory Compliance & KYC/AML
p.23
5Smart Contract Logic & Operations
p.31
6Custody & Security Infrastructure
p.39
7Liquidity Mechanisms & Market Making
p.47
8Risk Management & Circuit Breakers
p.55
9Tokenomics & Economic Model
p.63
10API Integration & Developer Tools
p.71
11Future Roadmap & Protocol Upgrades
p.79
12Conclusion & References
p.87

1. Introduction & Market Context

1.1 The Energy Tokenization Opportunity

The global energy sector represents over $4 trillion in annual capital expenditure, with energy companies constituting approximately 15% of global equity market capitalization. However, traditional energy markets suffer from:

  • Limited trading hours (NYSE: 9:30am-4pm ET, 21% of global hours)
  • High minimum investment thresholds for direct equity access
  • Settlement delays (T+2 for equities, T+1 for ETFs)
  • Geographic restrictions on cross-border energy investment
  • Illiquidity in private energy infrastructure assets

1.2 Why Blockchain for Energy Assets

Distributed ledger technology addresses these structural inefficiencies:

24/7 Settlement

Continuous trading and 3-5 second finality vs. T+2 settlement

Fractional Ownership

Programmable denomination enables access from $100 minimums

Global Access

Borderless infrastructure with compliant cross-border rails

Programmable Compliance

Automated KYC/AML, clawback, and transfer restrictions

1.3 EnerBase Protocol Overview

EnerBase leverages Stellar's institutional blockchain infrastructure to tokenize 260 energy assets across eight categories:

Oil & Gas Majors
46 assets
E&P Companies
35 assets
Midstream & LNG
22 assets
Refining
8 assets
Oilfield Services
30 assets
Energy Equipment
13 assets
Renewable Energy
12 assets
Utilities
94 assets

2. Stellar Blockchain Architecture

2.1 Stellar Consensus Protocol (SCP)

EnerBase is built on Stellar, which uses the Federated Byzantine Agreement (FBA) consensus mechanism rather than Proof of Work or traditional Byzantine Fault Tolerance. Key technical characteristics:

Technical Specifications:
• Consensus Algorithm: Federated Byzantine Agreement (FBA)
• Block Time: 3-5 seconds average
• Finality: Immediate (no probabilistic finality)
• Throughput: 1,000+ transactions per second
• Transaction Cost: ~$0.00001 USD
• Network Uptime: 99.99% (2023-2025)
• Validator Network: 50+ institutional nodes
• Energy Consumption: ~0.0002 kWh per transaction

2.2 Quorum Slices & Trust Model

Unlike traditional blockchain consensus where all nodes validate all transactions, Stellar's FBA allows each node to choose its own quorum slice—a set of validators it trusts. Safety is guaranteed as long as:

Quorum Intersection Property:
For any two quorums U₁ and U₂, U₁ ∩ U₂ ≠ ∅

Translation: All quorums must share at least one validator, ensuring network-wide agreement cannot be contradictory.
EnerBase Validator Configuration:
• Primary Tier: 7 institutional validators (Tier 1 banks, custodians)
• Secondary Tier: 15 energy companies & infrastructure providers
• Threshold: 67% agreement required for consensus

2.3 Transaction Structure & Operations

Stellar transactions consist of one or more operations executed atomically. For energy token transfers, typical operations include:

{ "source_account": "GINSTITUTIONAL...", "fee": "100", // 0.00001 XLM "sequence": "12345678901234", "operations": [ { "type": "payment", "destination": "GCOUNTERPARTY...", "asset": { "code": "ebSHELL", "issuer": "GENERBASE..." }, "amount": "1000.0000000" } ], "memo": { "type": "hash", "value": "sha256_compliance_hash" }, "signatures": ["ed25519_signature"] }

3. Token Issuance & Asset Framework

3.1 Asset Naming Convention

EnerBase tokens follow the format eb[COMPANY] where COMPANY is an abbreviated identifier. Examples:

ebSHELL
Shell PLC
ebEXXON
ExxonMobil
ebCHEVRON
Chevron Corp
ebBP
BP PLC
ebTOTAL
TotalEnergies
ebNEXTERA
NextEra Energy
ebVESTAS
Vestas Wind
ebENPHASE
Enphase Energy

3.2 Issuance Account Architecture

Each energy token is issued from a dedicated Stellar account with specific configuration:

Master Issuer: GENERBASE7XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Authorization: AUTHORIZATION_REQUIRED (SEP-0008)
Clawback: CLAWBACK_ENABLED (SEP-0035)
Revocability: AUTHORIZATION_REVOCABLE
Supply Model: Fixed cap per asset (immutable post-issuance)
Multi-Sig: 3-of-5 threshold (board control)

3.3 Trustline Establishment & Authorization

Before acquiring EnerBase tokens, institutional investors must:

  1. Complete KYC/AML verification (accredited investor status, entity documentation)
  2. Establish trustline to desired asset (ChangeTrust operation)
  3. Receive authorization from issuer account (AllowTrust operation)
  4. Execute acquisition (Payment or PathPayment operation)

Regulatory Rationale: The AUTHORIZATION_REQUIRED flag ensures only vetted institutional investors can hold EnerBase tokens, maintaining regulatory compliance and preventing unauthorized retail access.

4. Regulatory Compliance & KYC/AML

4.1 Accredited Investor Verification

EnerBase employs a multi-layered verification process aligned with SEC Regulation D (Rule 506(c)):

Institutional Investors
• Minimum $5M AUM or $25M+ balance sheet
• Verified entity registration documents
• Ultimate beneficial ownership disclosure (UBO)
• Third-party verification via accredited partners (Veriff, Onfido)
Qualified Purchasers
• $5M+ in investments (individuals) or $25M+ (entities)
• CPA attestation or brokerage statements
• Enhanced due diligence for non-US entities

4.2 AML/CTF Screening

All institutional investors undergo continuous monitoring:

OFAC Screening: Real-time sanctions list verification (SDN, SSI, FSE)
PEP Checks: Politically exposed person identification & enhanced monitoring
Transaction Monitoring: Pattern analysis for suspicious activity (SAR triggers)
Adverse Media: Automated news scanning for reputational risks
Geographic Blocking: FATF high-risk & blacklisted jurisdictions

4.3 Transfer Restrictions & Clawback

EnerBase implements SEP-0035 clawback functionality for regulatory compliance:

// Clawback Operation Example { "type": "clawback", "from": "GNONCOMPLIANT...", // Source account "asset": { "code": "ebSHELL", "issuer": "GENERBASE..." }, "amount": "500.0000000", "source_account": "GENERBASE..." // Only issuer can clawback } // Use Cases: // 1. Court order / regulatory mandate // 2. Fraudulent account activity // 3. Sanctions list addition // 4. Loss of accredited investor status // 5. Breach of terms of service

6. Custody & Security Infrastructure

6.1 Institutional Custody Partners

EnerBase integrates with leading institutional custodians:

Fireblocks (Recommended)
• MPC-based key management
• SOC 2 Type II certified
• $4B+ insurance coverage
• Direct Stellar integration
Coinbase Custody
• Qualified custodian (NYDFS)
• Cold storage (98% of assets)
• $320M insurance pool
• Stellar asset support

6.2 Cryptographic Security Model

Ed25519 Signatures:
Stellar uses Ed25519 elliptic curve cryptography (Curve25519) for all transactions. Each account is secured by a 256-bit private key, producing 64-byte signatures.
Multi-Signature Schemes:
EnerBase issuer accounts employ M-of-N multi-sig (e.g., 3-of-5) with weighted thresholds:
Master Weight: 0 (disabled)
Signer 1 (CEO): Weight 2
Signer 2 (CFO): Weight 2
Signer 3 (CTO): Weight 2
Signer 4 (Legal): Weight 1
Signer 5 (Compliance): Weight 1
Low Threshold: 3 (routine ops)
Medium Threshold: 5 (asset changes)
High Threshold: 6 (critical ops)

12. Conclusion

EnerBase represents a comprehensive institutional infrastructure for energy asset tokenization, combining Stellar's performant blockchain architecture with robust regulatory compliance, institutional-grade custody, and sophisticated risk management.

By tokenizing 260 energy assets across oil & gas, renewables, and utilities, EnerBase provides institutional investors with 24/7 liquid access to global energy markets, fractional ownership capabilities, and programmable compliance controls that exceed traditional equity market standards.

The protocol's technical foundation—Stellar's FBA consensus, SEP compliance primitives, and institutional custody integration—positions EnerBase as the leading platform for compliant, scalable energy asset digitization.

References

[1] Stellar Development Foundation. "Stellar Consensus Protocol." 2025.
[2] Mazières, D. "The Stellar Consensus Protocol: A Federated Model for Internet-level Consensus." 2016.
[3] SEC. "Regulation D - Rules Governing the Limited Offer and Sale of Securities." 17 CFR §230.506.
[4] FATF. "Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and VASPs." June 2019.
[5] Stellar Ecosystem Proposal 0008 (SEP-0008): "Regulated Assets." 2024.
[6] Stellar Ecosystem Proposal 0035 (SEP-0035): "Clawback." 2024.
[7] NYDFS. "Virtual Currency Custody Guidance." Part 200, 23 NYCRR 200.
EnerBase Protocol White Paper v2.0
Published: January 2026
© 2026 EnerBase. All rights reserved.
institutional@enerbase.org